Thursday, March 06, 2008

Healing consensus is reached.

"Of course the Slanderyou website is an attack website on Landeryou, ... a necessary antitode to the other. ... In any case I think it is outrageous to say that (wikipedia) articles can't link to websites that attack the subject of the aricle. Adam 07:37, 2 January 2006 (UTC)"

We wholeheartedly agree.

16 Truth On Comments:

Cait Catt said...

Wikipedia won't allow links to Slanderyou from Landeryou because Wikipedia correctly see that Slanderyou is the (copyrighted phrase) BLOG OF FILTH

Rita Randles said...

Stephen Ho is the husband of Paula Rizzuto, failed candidate for the Moreland City Council. She has her own blog, which is absolutely mad. She once even linked to Landeryou.
She also claimed on her blog that she ate her husband the Ho, and not even Landeryou would print that rubbish.

Wikipedia is correct in not allowing stories about Paula Rizzuto, as she is a minor failed candidate of no consequence whatever.

Similarly Wikipedia is correct in not allowing a link from its entry about Andrew Landeryou, a key former key figure in the Australian Labor Party and now Australia's leading blogger and winner of the inaugural Walkley Blog Award, to the parody site and BLOG of FILTH Slanderyou.

The Slanderyou blog, like the blog of failed candidate Rizzuto, is a blog from a person of no consequence.

Anonymous said...

Where does Landeryou get his leaks from. He's been getting a lot from the Liberals lately. Now he's getting good ones from the ALP. Today he exposes the Victorian Parliamentary ALP's worst leaker, a Greek woman named Jenny Mikakos. Read on:

WHICH WITCH WAS WHICH: Jenny Mik Picked In Caucus Line-up

Just as the Comeback Ice Queen Hillary Clinton looks like winning key primary battles in Ohio and Texas, an equally cantankerous, unpopular and surly feminist has been identified as the main likely culprit in the Whodunnit mystery involving a Victorian Labor caucus member and some rather uncharitable remarks about Premier John Brumby.

NASTY MIKAKOS

Jenny Mikakos, a snarly and hairy Luddite socialist who goes through more razors than a barbershop quartet, is believed to be steaming mad over the steady decline of enviro-Thwaites policies in the state government since his departure last year under a cloud over his use and abuse of government ski lodges.

The OC understands that while many caucus members were called by The Australian, she and another colleague who shall remain nameless opened up, spewing forth venom about the imagined deficiencies of the patriot Premier.

HASN'T DOOR-KNOCKED IN A DECADE

Her claims to have encountered bad voter responses while door-knocking must surely only relate to her one attempt at meeting and greeting punters in Northcote back in the late 90s when she was told in no uncertain terms by the first house she visited to "stick her ugly fat head up her a*se" by one of the local branch members. She hasn't been back for more.

The Parl Sec/Shrew's grievance is that Brumby has taken personal charge of many contentious issues and is not afraid to lead on them. "It's not like it was," she moans to all those willing to listen like Comrade Carlo Carli, nostalgically remembering the powerful influence of then Deputy Premier John Thwaites and his green agenda. On issues like genetically enhanced crops, the new Premier has listened but not been afraid to take action for the good of the state's farmers.

WHILE KNOCK KNOCK-NOCKING ON HEAVEN'S DOOR

Mikakos is also furious that she has not been promoted to the Ministry, with intra-factional foes like Daniel Andrews, Gavin Jennings and Peter Batchelor all basking in the glory of their ministries. She is said to be particularly resentful about Batchelor, telling one northern suburbs confrere that he "should make way" for "young talent". The Mikakos fancies herself as that talent, despite her only claim to fame outside of branch-stacking, postal allowance rorting, inciting racial hatred and services to the hirsute that of being a "tax lawyer" for some of Melbourne's dodgiest law firms. Mentions of the word "Wickenby" are said to quickly gain her attention, to say nothing of even more sweat on the brow of upper house sweat-hog Evan Thornley.

This circumstantial evidence is enough in the Court of Treasury Place opinion to find the Parliamentary Secretary for Not Much guilty of leaking. Like our friends in NSW ICAC, what we lack in a standard of proof, we make up with a certain passion for pitchfork justice.

Game on.

Anonymous said...

In the comments section of the Landeryou blog a question is asked - "will Mikakos be Victoria's first woman Premier?"

Read it quickly before Landeryou takes it off. He doesn't like Mikakos.

In our defence, however, we must admit we don't think a Mikakos Premier is going to happen, so we possibly agree with Landeryou on that.

We also point out that Mikakos is a good branch stacker, or at least her mother is, and that branch stacking was responsible for her preselection over Pat Power for the Legislative Council.

Anonymous said...

Below is a taste of the comments on the Paula Rizzuto blog. A blog, like Slanderyou, banned by Wikipedia. Landeryou is referred to in it to. Read on:

Out on a motorbike. I rock"


Blogger Robert Matthews ha detto...

Well big fat Paula you should be proud of yourself. You made the Landeryou blog poll. Almost as many people think you are a poor journo on The Age as they do Ms Carbone!

1:03 AM
Blogger Robert Matthews ha detto...

Paula when are you going to stop writing crap on the Slandersyou blog. Rather than talk about being fat, and I couldn't care less what your weight is, or use the four letter expletive beginning with the letter f, how about answering the crap the Liberals write on the blog using reasoned argument. I think the Liberal arguments on the Slandersyou blog are idiotic, but we do need to answer them. Robert Doyle is not a stupid man and he would not be posting on Slandersyou unless he had a reason to do so. That reason may be to try to attract disaffected ALP voters in upper house regions where the ALP might get four of the five spots. Doyle only has to attract a very few voters for Bernie Finn to have another Liberal from western metropolitan elected to sit alongside him. He knows that Liberal arguments on a leftish blog WILL convince a small number of low IQ voters, and they are out there.

Paula PLEASE write sensible comments and cut out the expletives. It denigrates everything you write.

12:05 AM
Blogger Mary Mathnon ha detto...

This blog is crap. Landeryou ought to be ashamed of himself for promoting it.

11:29 PM
Blogger Big Paula ha detto...

I promote all sorts of blergs on my bog.

What's it to ya Mary Mo Mathnon?

11:07 AM
Anonimo Anonimo ha detto...

The author of this blog is registered on the Sex Offenders Register - true!

6:42 PM
Blogger Big Paula ha detto...

Stephen Ho is no longer on the register, it all related to an incident a long time ago.

8:13 PM
Anonimo Anonimo ha detto...

no! - the author of the Big Paula blog is a registered child molester

9:35 PM
Blogger Big Paula ha detto...

I'm really not and nor is Stephen, after that little misunderstanding.

12:11 AM
Anonimo bear wabbit ha detto...

OMG!! You're a child molester too?

I feel so close to you right now, Paula.

Robert Matthews sounds a wee bit dull.

And Mathnon - that's a nun's name, isn't it?

HUGGIES!!

8:12 PM
Anonimo permanant hair removal ha dett

Anonymous said...

What a stupid blog Paula Rizzuto has

Anonymous said...

The IQ of some Slanderyou readers would have to be as low as Paula Rizzuto to read that crap. Likewise Mr Landeryou who obviously reads it too, going by 3.46 AM.

Some people who post to this blog keep strange hours.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, Landeryou has been very busy in this blog. Obviously its because Slanderyou has more readers, so why not discuss things here.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 3.15 (really Landeryou) said...

"Where does Landeryou get his leaks from. He's been getting a lot from the Liberals lately. Now he's getting good ones from the ALP"

The leaks are of course straight from the far right of the Liberal Party. Who else would have the similar moral standards and levels of decency as Landeryou. Both deserve each other.

As to the ALP, links have been made with LU, but I can assure you that, if that link ever existed, LU are moving 100mph away from Landeryou.

His track record and reputation are like a cancer. Who would want to catch cancer?

Kevin of Southbank said...

Channel Ten should immediately launch legal action against lander you for fragrant breach of copyright. If you notice his pic in story http://andrewlanderyou.blogspot.com/2008/03/which-witch-was-which-jenny-mik-picked.html is a digital pic/screen dump. Did lander you have approval from Channel Ten? Throw the book at him C10.

Anonymous said...

Hey Landeryou, looks like you didn't get any sleep last might, looking for the comments times of all the early comments here.

What is keeping you up?

Court cases?

Kevin of Southbank said...

Andrew Landeryou's Cesspit Blog (copyrighted phrase) is the true Blog of Filth.

Try and sue me Cait Landeryou

Anna F said...

Marbain, Global Tertiary Solutions, B.V. Sachsen
and Institutional Services - follow the money

Anonymous said...

El Gordo hides cowardly behind his bankruptcy to avoid defamation suits but the moment he comes out from bankruptcy - if ever - the legal eagles will swoop. Living in the shadows is no way to lead a life. What sad, sad excuse for a man.

Anonymous said...

Thought this would clarify a few things.

http://www.itsa.gov.au/dir228/itsaweb.nsf/docindex/About%20Us-%3EBankruptcy%20Congress-%3E2002%20Congress%20Documents/$FILE/Murray.doc?OpenElement

An obvious and significant difference between personal and corporate insolvency law is that in bankruptcy, the person continues to exist during bankruptcy separate from the administration of her or his estate, and continues to exist after bankruptcy is over – not to die like a company after liquidation. Much of the difference between the two systems lies in those realities.

The bankruptcy regime does not become too involved in the personal side of the bankrupt, both to the bankrupt’s advantage, and disadvantage. There are these two contrasting perspectives to the continued existence of the bankrupt person.

One is that the bankrupt person retains elements of their persona that bankruptcy law cannot touch. For example, the bankrupt person can keep their personal possessions, can sue for defamation of their character, and can earn their moderate income.

The second is that bankruptcy law leaves the bankrupt person unprotected from certain financial issues personal to themselves. Thus a bankrupt remains liable to pay a criminal fine, to account for the consequences of their civil fraud, and to attend to certain statutory financial obligations.

These elements of protection and non-protection continue on from the pre-bankruptcy stage, through the bankruptcy, and beyond it.

Anonymous said...

Thought this would clarify a few things.

http://www.itsa.gov.au/dir228/itsaweb.nsf/docindex/About%20Us-%3EBankruptcy%20Congress-%3E2002%20Congress%20Documents/$FILE/Murray.doc?OpenElement

An obvious and significant difference between personal and corporate insolvency law is that in bankruptcy, the person continues to exist during bankruptcy separate from the administration of her or his estate, and continues to exist after bankruptcy is over – not to die like a company after liquidation. Much of the difference between the two systems lies in those realities.

The bankruptcy regime does not become too involved in the personal side of the bankrupt, both to the bankrupt’s advantage, and disadvantage. There are these two contrasting perspectives to the continued existence of the bankrupt person.

One is that the bankrupt person retains elements of their persona that bankruptcy law cannot touch. For example, the bankrupt person can keep their personal possessions, can sue for defamation of their character, and can earn their moderate income.

The second is that bankruptcy law leaves the bankrupt person unprotected from certain financial issues personal to themselves. Thus a bankrupt remains liable to pay a criminal fine, to account for the consequences of their civil fraud, and to attend to certain statutory financial obligations.

These elements of protection and non-protection continue on from the pre-bankruptcy stage, through the bankruptcy, and beyond it.