The Dark Rider said...

We feature the comments of a valued reader, The Dark Rider who said...

Congratulations on the first reasoned if somewhat heavily biased post to appear on this site. As someone who long responded to Landeryou’s posts and came to understand how he really operates, I’ve been hoping someone else would pick up the Slandersyou ‘standard’.

After watching my comments being edited and deleted, I realised unless I was willing to set up a blog and devote a lot of time to making it work, I wouldn’t be able to achieve the level of debate and closer scrutiny I think a lot of his ‘reports’ deserve. If nothing else, a forum where dissenting views to Landeryou’s can be put forward without being sabotaged would be a great start.

Obviously, there’s an agenda with this blog, but I’d rather focus on what rapidly became apparent to me reading Landeryou’s blog, which ironically enough, I originally discovered through a reference of Crikey.

Of course, watching Landeryou's hypocritical, slanderous, self-serving rants was almost as illuminating as watching people's responses to him.

Quite frankly, The Age's gossip columnists have played right into his hands, with these 'fatty' references. As has Stephen Mayne's remarkably clumsy attempts to paint him as Delia Delegate, something which can only damage him with ALP insiders if they believe it.

I'm not in the ALP and I don't believe it. It just doesn't gel.

What I find difficult to believe is all of these people will sink down to his level when the biggest frustration for Landeryou was the perception they had credibility and he didn't.

The one thing Landeryou can't fight is detached, clinical, analysis of his activities. There is more information required. But so far, no-one's really bothered to properly investigate.

Here's hoping that changes.

The Dark Rider